Traditional blockchain integrations require explicit support at both the wallet and DApp layers. However, InfiniSVM introduces a wallet-agnostic approach that shifts transaction broadcasting responsibility from wallets to DApps, enabling seamless user onboarding without requiring explicit wallet integration.


​
Key Differences Between EVM and SVM Models

​
EVM L2s: Wallet-Dependent Model

  • EIP-155 enforces chain ID inclusion in the signature payload, making it wallet-restricted.
  • Wallets are responsible for transaction broadcasting, meaning each wallet must explicitly support each chain.

​
InfiniSVM: DApp-First Model

  • SVM signatures do not include chain IDs in the transaction structure.
  • Instead, each transaction references a recent block hash, ensuring that cross-chain replays are automatically rejected.
  • DApps, not wallets, handle transaction broadcasting, meaning any Solana-compatible wallet can be used without modification.

​
Seamless Wallet Compatibility with InfiniSVM SDK

Using the InfiniSVM SDK, DApps can generate and sign transactions that are compatible with any Solana-based wallet, without requiring:

  • Native wallet support for InfiniSVM.
  • Explicit chain ID handling in wallets.
  • Wallet-driven broadcasting logic.

​
Advantages of This Approach

  • Broader wallet compatibility: Users can interact with InfiniSVM DApps using any Solana-compatible wallet.
  • Simplified onboarding: No need for wallets to add explicit chain support—DApps handle everything.
  • Flexible asset management: While native wallet support enhances asset visibility, it is not required for transaction execution.

InfiniSVM’s DApp-first integration model removes the wallet bottleneck by shifting transaction execution responsibilities to DApps.

Was this page helpful?