Wallet-Agnostic & dApp-First Integration
Traditional blockchain integrations require explicit support at both the wallet and DApp layers. However, InfiniSVM introduces a wallet-agnostic approach that shifts transaction broadcasting responsibility from wallets to DApps, enabling seamless user onboarding without requiring explicit wallet integration.
Key Differences Between EVM and SVM Models
EVM L2s: Wallet-Dependent Model
- EIP-155 enforces chain ID inclusion in the signature payload, making it wallet-restricted.
- Wallets are responsible for transaction broadcasting, meaning each wallet must explicitly support each chain.
InfiniSVM: DApp-First Model
- SVM signatures do not include chain IDs in the transaction structure.
- Instead, each transaction references a recent block hash, ensuring that cross-chain replays are automatically rejected.
- DApps, not wallets, handle transaction broadcasting, meaning any Solana-compatible wallet can be used without modification.
Seamless Wallet Compatibility with InfiniSVM SDK
Using the InfiniSVM SDK, DApps can generate and sign transactions that are compatible with any Solana-based wallet, without requiring:
- Native wallet support for InfiniSVM.
- Explicit chain ID handling in wallets.
- Wallet-driven broadcasting logic.
Advantages of This Approach
- Broader wallet compatibility: Users can interact with InfiniSVM DApps using any Solana-compatible wallet.
- Simplified onboarding: No need for wallets to add explicit chain support—DApps handle everything.
- Flexible asset management: While native wallet support enhances asset visibility, it is not required for transaction execution.
InfiniSVM’s DApp-first integration model removes the wallet bottleneck by shifting transaction execution responsibilities to DApps.
Was this page helpful?